Introducing ATLASLearn more
Legal Opinion

People v. James

California Court of Appeal

Decided November 12, 1969No. Crim. 7808PublishedCited by 16 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

Opinion

CALDECOTT, J.

Respondent Ronald James was charged with violating Health and Safety Code sections 11911 and 11912, and Penal Code section 4574. The respondent’s motion to set aside the information under Penal Code section 995 was granted. The People appeal from this order.

Officer Dalby, of the California Highway Patrol, stopped the car driven by the respondent for speeding, and at the time noticed it did not have a current registration tag on the rear license plate. The respondent was unable to produce a driver’s license or any other identification for himself or thé registration for the…

2Cases cited10 opinions

  1. People v. DillonCalifornia Supreme Court · 1926
  2. People v. NebbittCalifornia Court of Appeal · 1960
  3. People v. GalceranCalifornia Court of Appeal · 1960
  4. Virgil v. Superior CourtCalifornia Court of Appeal · 1968
  5. People v. UptonCalifornia Court of Appeal · 1968

5 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by16 opinions

  1. People v. Superior CourtCalifornia Supreme Court · 1972
  2. People v. LowCalifornia Supreme Court · 2010
  3. People v. SaundersCalifornia Supreme Court · 2006
  4. People v. NagelCalifornia Court of Appeal · 1971
  5. Thomas v. Superior CourtCalifornia Court of Appeal · 1972

11 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

View API DocsGet API Key

Powered by the Exa API