Behlke v. Conwed Corp.
Court of Appeals of Minnesota
1Opinion of the Court
OPINION
FOLEY, Judge.
Appellants Lawrence E. Behlke and Dorothea S. Behlke challenge the trial court’s denial of motions for judgment notwithstanding the verdict, a new trial or a directed verdict. The Behlkes maintain the exclusion of a witness’ prior inconsistent statements, limitation of expert testimony and denial of Behlke’s request for a directed verdict were an abuse of discretion that deprived the Behlkes of a fair trial. They also contend evidence of an alleged OSHA regulation violation should have been allowed in evidence. We affirm in part, reverse in part and remand for a new trial.
F…
2Cases cited26 opinions
- Alford v. United StatesSupreme Court of the United States · 1931
- Wild v. RarigSupreme Court of Minnesota · 1975
- State v. SaldanaSupreme Court of Minnesota · 1982
- Christy v. SalitermanSupreme Court of Minnesota · 1970
- Conover v. Northern States Power Co.Supreme Court of Minnesota · 1981
21 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by7 opinions
- Lake Superior Center Authority v. Hammel, Green & Abrahamson, Inc.Court of Appeals of Minnesota · 2006
- Zorgdrager v. State Wide Sales, Inc.Court of Appeals of Minnesota · 1992
- TORCHWOOD PROPERTIES, LLC v. McKinnonCourt of Appeals of Minnesota · 2010
- O'NEIL v. Wells Concrete Products Co.Court of Appeals of Minnesota · 1991
- Rush v. WyethDistrict Court, E.D. Arkansas · 2007
2 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.