Legal Opinion

Behlke v. Conwed Corp.

Court of Appeals of Minnesota

Decided August 6, 1991No. C0-90-2610PublishedCited by 7 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

OPINION

FOLEY, Judge.

Appellants Lawrence E. Behlke and Dorothea S. Behlke challenge the trial court’s denial of motions for judgment notwithstanding the verdict, a new trial or a directed verdict. The Behlkes maintain the exclusion of a witness’ prior inconsistent statements, limitation of expert testimony and denial of Behlke’s request for a directed verdict were an abuse of discretion that deprived the Behlkes of a fair trial. They also contend evidence of an alleged OSHA regulation violation should have been allowed in evidence. We affirm in part, reverse in part and remand for a new trial.

F…

2Cases cited26 opinions

  1. Alford v. United StatesSupreme Court of the United States · 1931
  2. Wild v. RarigSupreme Court of Minnesota · 1975
  3. State v. SaldanaSupreme Court of Minnesota · 1982
  4. Christy v. SalitermanSupreme Court of Minnesota · 1970
  5. Conover v. Northern States Power Co.Supreme Court of Minnesota · 1981

21 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by7 opinions

  1. Lake Superior Center Authority v. Hammel, Green & Abrahamson, Inc.Court of Appeals of Minnesota · 2006
  2. Zorgdrager v. State Wide Sales, Inc.Court of Appeals of Minnesota · 1992
  3. TORCHWOOD PROPERTIES, LLC v. McKinnonCourt of Appeals of Minnesota · 2010
  4. O'NEIL v. Wells Concrete Products Co.Court of Appeals of Minnesota · 1991
  5. Rush v. WyethDistrict Court, E.D. Arkansas · 2007

2 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API