Legal Opinion
O'NEIL v. Wells Concrete Products Co.
Court of Appeals of Minnesota
Decided November 19, 1991No. C0-91-883PublishedCited by 1 opinion
1Opinion of the Court
OPINION
DAVIES, Judge.
Appellant challenges the trial court’s admission of testimony regarding OSHA requirements as evidence of negligence, denial of a jury instruction on superseding cause, and refusal to grant JNOV or a new trial. Respondents challenge the trial court’s decision to reduce an award for consortium by the percentage of the injured party’s fault. We affirm.
FACTS
Appellant Wells Concrete, as a subcontractor for Bor-Son Construction, manufactured and installed a roof over the swimming pool in the Edinborough enclosed park project in Edina. The roof panels were manufactured and…
2Cases cited6 opinions
- Thill v. Modern Erecting Co.Supreme Court of Minnesota · 1969
- Ray Marshall, Secretary of Labor v. Knutson Construction Company and Occupational Safety and Health Review CommissionCourt of Appeals for the Eighth Circuit · 1977
- Cofran v. SwanmanSupreme Court of Minnesota · 1947
- Peter J. Brennan, Secretary of Labor v. Occupational Safety and Health Review Commission and Underhill Construction Corporation, Underhill Construction Corp. And Dic Concrete Corp., Individually and as Participants in a Joint Venture Known as Dic-Underhill, a Joint Venture v. Peter J. Brennan and Occupational Safety and Health Review CommissionCourt of Appeals for the Second Circuit · 1975
- Gilbertson v. GrossSupreme Court of Minnesota · 1951
1 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by1 opinion
- Kane v. Hartz Mountain IndustriesNew Jersey Superior Court Appellate Division · 1994