Legal Opinion

TORCHWOOD PROPERTIES, LLC v. McKinnon

Court of Appeals of Minnesota

Decided July 13, 2010No. A09-1993PublishedCited by 2 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

OPINION

ROSS, Judge.

This appeal requires us to decide whether we can meaningfully review for prejudicial error a district court’s denial of a party’s midtrial motions for a continuance or a new trial after the party reacted to the denial by refusing to participate further in the trial. Trial counsel for a landowner suing its neighbor for negligent property maintenance discovered while cross-examining the neighbor that the neighbor had failed to produce handwritten notes requested during discovery. After the district court denied the plaintiff landowner’s motions for a continuance or for a new…

2Cases cited9 opinions

  1. Wild v. RarigSupreme Court of Minnesota · 1975
  2. Dunshee v. DouglasSupreme Court of Minnesota · 1977
  3. Vangsness v. VangsnessCourt of Appeals of Minnesota · 2000
  4. Poppenhagen v. SORNSIN CONSTRUCTION COMPANYSupreme Court of Minnesota · 1974
  5. In Re Estate of ForsytheSupreme Court of Minnesota · 1946

4 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by2 opinions

  1. Larson v. Gannett Co.Court of Appeals of Minnesota · 2018
  2. TORCHWOOD PROPERTIES, LLC v. McKinnonCourt of Appeals of Minnesota · 2010

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API