TORCHWOOD PROPERTIES, LLC v. McKinnon
Court of Appeals of Minnesota
1Opinion of the Court
OPINION
ROSS, Judge.
This appeal requires us to decide whether we can meaningfully review for prejudicial error a district court’s denial of a party’s midtrial motions for a continuance or a new trial after the party reacted to the denial by refusing to participate further in the trial. Trial counsel for a landowner suing its neighbor for negligent property maintenance discovered while cross-examining the neighbor that the neighbor had failed to produce handwritten notes requested during discovery. After the district court denied the plaintiff landowner’s motions for a continuance or for a new…
2Cases cited9 opinions
- Wild v. RarigSupreme Court of Minnesota · 1975
- Dunshee v. DouglasSupreme Court of Minnesota · 1977
- Vangsness v. VangsnessCourt of Appeals of Minnesota · 2000
- Poppenhagen v. SORNSIN CONSTRUCTION COMPANYSupreme Court of Minnesota · 1974
- In Re Estate of ForsytheSupreme Court of Minnesota · 1946
4 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by2 opinions
- Larson v. Gannett Co.Court of Appeals of Minnesota · 2018
- TORCHWOOD PROPERTIES, LLC v. McKinnonCourt of Appeals of Minnesota · 2010