Legal Opinion

City of Redmond v. Burkhart

Court of Appeals of Washington

Decided January 24, 2000No. 43162-5-IPublishedCited by 15 opinions

1Opinion of the CourtColeman, J.

Steven Burkhart telephoned his wife and, after conversing a short while, became angry and threatened to kill her. The telephone harassment statute under which he was charged prohibits making a telephone call threatening injury with the intent to intimidate. This case presents a unique question—does “make” in the context of making a telephone call encompass all stages of the call until the call is terminated or does it describe only the initiation of the call? Based upon the statutory construction as well as the ordinary meaning of “make,” we hold that “make,” as used in RCW 9.61.230, refers…

2Cases cited10 opinions

  1. Cornelius v. NAACP Legal Defense & Educational Fund, Inc.Supreme Court of the United States · 1985
  2. State v. KnapstadWashington Supreme Court · 1986
  3. State v. AlvarezWashington Supreme Court · 1995
  4. City of Seattle v. HuffWashington Supreme Court · 1989
  5. State v. ChesterWashington Supreme Court · 1997

5 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by15 opinions

  1. State v. LilybladWashington Supreme Court · 2008
  2. State v. LilybladWashington Supreme Court · 2008
  3. State v. MenesesCourt of Appeals of Washington · 2009
  4. State v. MenesesCourt of Appeals of Washington · 2009
  5. Department of Labor & Industries v. Mitchell Brothers Truck Line, Inc.Court of Appeals of Washington · 2002

10 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API