Legal Opinion
State v. Meneses
Court of Appeals of Washington
Decided April 13, 2009No. 61118-6-IPublishedCited by 14 opinions
1Opinion of the Court
205 P.3d 916 (2009)
STATE of Washington, Respondent,
v.
Andre Toi MENESES, Appellant.
No. 61118-6-I.
Court of Appeals of Washington, Division 1.
April 13, 2009.
Elizabeth McNeely Albertson, Washington Appellate Project, Seattle, WA, for Appellant.
Andre Toi Meneses, pro se.
Erin S. Norgaard, King County Prosecuting Attorney's Office, Seattle, WA, for Respondent.
GROSSE, J.
¶ 1 To ensure that the State is held to its burden of proving a defendant's guilt beyond a reasonable doubt, jury instructions must include every essential element of the charged crime(s). Telephone harassment requires that the…
2Cases cited15 opinions
- Blockburger v. United StatesSupreme Court of the United States · 1931
- United States v. DixonSupreme Court of the United States · 1993
- State v. WorkmanWashington Supreme Court · 1978
- In re the Personal Restraint of OrangeWashington Supreme Court · 2004
- State v. CalleWashington Supreme Court · 1995
10 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by14 opinions
- State v. ThompsonCourt of Appeals of Washington · 2012
- State Of Washington, Resp-cross v. Danny Giles, App-crossCourt of Appeals of Washington · 2016
- State v. MenesesWashington Supreme Court · 2010
- State v. MenesesWashington Supreme Court · 2010
- United States v. Robert WaggyCourt of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit · 2019
9 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.