Legal Opinion

In Re Upstream Addicks and Barker (Texas) Flood-Control Reservoirs v. United States

United States Court of Federal Claims

Decided October 28, 2022No. 17-9001Published

1Opinion of the Court

In the United States Court of Federal Claims Sub-Master Docket No. 17-9001L (Filed: October 28, 2022) ********************************** ) Taking via government-induced flooding IN RE UPSTREAM ADDICKS AND ) of private property; post-trial decision on BARKER (TEXAS) FLOOD- ) just compensation for six bellwether CONTROL RESERVOIRS ) plaintiffs; text of flowage easement to be ) filed in pertinent title records of affected ********************************** ) properties THIS DOCUMENT APPLIES TO: ) ) ALL UPSTREAM CASES ) ) ********************************** ) Daniel H. Charest and E. Lawrence…

2Cases cited49 opinions

  1. United States v. CausbySupreme Court of the United States · 1946
  2. United States v. General Motors Corp.Supreme Court of the United States · 1945
  3. Olson v. United StatesSupreme Court of the United States · 1934
  4. Tahoe-Sierra Preservation Council, Inc. v. Tahoe Regional Planning AgencySupreme Court of the United States · 2002
  5. United States Ex Rel. Tennessee Valley Authority v. PowelsonSupreme Court of the United States · 1943

44 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API