Legal Opinion

Jones v. Main

Supreme Court of Kansas

Decided January 22, 1966No. 44,250PublishedCited by 9 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

The opinion of the court was delivered by

Fontron, J.:

This appeal is from a default judgment entered in a garnishment proceeding against Perfecto Torrez, the garnishee defendant, and the appellant herein.

The facts are not controverted. On July 23, 1964, the plaintiffs and appellees, Billy L. Jones and Patricia J. Jones, having an unsatisfied judgment against James H. Main d/b/a J. H. Main Construction Co., filed, through their counsel, a garnishment affidavit alleging that Perfecto Torrez was indebted to the delinquent Mr. Main. Pursuant to this affidavit, the clerk of the district court…

2Cases cited9 opinions

  1. Bass v. HoaglandCourt of Appeals for the Fifth Circuit · 1949
  2. Rio Del Mar Country Club, Inc. v. Superior CourtCalifornia Court of Appeal · 1948
  3. Zaro v. StraussCourt of Appeals for the Fifth Circuit · 1948
  4. Salina National Bank v. PrescottSupreme Court of Kansas · 1899
  5. In re the Estate of CoolWarren County Surrogate's Court · 1941

4 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by9 opinions

  1. Sharp v. SharpSupreme Court of Kansas · 1966
  2. Hood v. HaynesCourt of Appeals of Kansas · 1982
  3. Schwerdt, Grace & Niemackl v. Speedway Festivals, Inc.Court of Appeals of Kansas · 1981
  4. McCreery v. McCreerySupreme Court of Kansas · 1972
  5. E & M Ready-Mix & Pre-Cast, Inc. v. SandersCourt of Appeals of Kansas · 1995

4 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API