Legal Opinion

State ex rel. Bruggeman v. Court of Common Pleas

Ohio Supreme Court

Decided December 1, 1999No. 99-956PublishedCited by 7 opinions

1Per curiam

Bruggeman asserts that the court of appeals erred in dismissing his habeas corpus petition. For the following reasons, Bruggeman’s assertion is meritless.

In order to prevail on a petition for a writ of habeas corpus in a child custody case, the petitioner must establish that (1) the child is being unlawfully detained, and (2) the petitioner has the superior legal right to custody of the child. Holloway v. Clermont Cty. Dept. of Human Serv. (1997), 80 Ohio St.3d 128, 130, 684 N.E.2d 1217, 1219.

Here, Bruggeman did not allege any superior legal right to custody of the child. Further, from his…

2Cases cited2 opinions

  1. Pegan v. CrawmerOhio Supreme Court · 1996
  2. Holloway v. Clermont County Department of Human ServicesOhio Supreme Court · 1997

3Cited by7 opinions

  1. Davis v. WilsonOhio Supreme Court · 2003
  2. In re BaileyOhio Supreme Court · 2003
  3. Adoption Link, Inc. v. SuverOhio Supreme Court · 2006
  4. State ex rel. Bruggeman v. Auglaize Cty. Court of Common PleasOhio Supreme Court · 1999
  5. State ex rel. C v. v. Adoption Link, Inc. (Slip Opinion)Ohio Supreme Court · 2019

2 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API