Legal Opinion

In re Bailey

Ohio Supreme Court

Decided March 12, 2003No. 2002-1691PublishedCited by 5 opinions

1Per curiam

{¶ 1} Appellants, Gordon and Linda Bailey, are the biological parents of Danielle N. Bailey, a minor child born on June 19, 1992. In November 1995, appellants voluntarily placed Danielle with appellee, Alice Hempen, a nonrelative. In 1996, Gordon Bailey, Linda Bailey, and Hempen filed petitions in the Hamilton County Court of Common Pleas, Juvenile Division, for custody of Danielle. Gordon Bailey withdrew his petition and agreed that custody of Danielle should be awarded to Hempen. The juvenile court found that Gordon and Linda Bailey were “unable, unfit, and unsuitable to parent at this time…

2Cases cited12 opinions

  1. Chari v. VoreOhio Supreme Court · 2001
  2. In re Sanjivini K.New York Court of Appeals · 1979
  3. State ex rel. Gaydosh v. City of TwinsburgOhio Supreme Court · 2001
  4. State ex rel. Banc One Corp. v. WalkerOhio Supreme Court · 1999
  5. Holloway v. Clermont County Department of Human ServicesOhio Supreme Court · 1997

7 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by5 opinions

  1. Smith v. BradshawOhio Supreme Court · 2006
  2. Ross v. SarosOhio Supreme Court · 2003
  3. Vaughn v. WyrembekOhio Supreme Court · 2011
  4. Adoption Link, Inc. v. SuverOhio Supreme Court · 2006
  5. In Re Bailey, Unpublished Decision (8-17-2007)Ohio Court of Appeals · 2007

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API