Legal Opinion

South Orange Trust Co. v. Hartley

New Jersey Superior Court Appellate Division

Decided December 18, 1953PublishedCited by 3 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

29 N.J. Super. 58 (1953)

101 A.2d 616

SOUTH ORANGE TRUST COMPANY, A BANKING CORPORATION OF THE STATE OF NEW JERSEY, PLAINTIFF,

v.

BENJAMIN A. HARTLEY, ALSO KNOWN AS BENJAMIN ALBERT HARTLEY, ALSO KNOWN AS BENJAMIN A. HARTLEY, SR.; MARION V. HARTLEY, ALSO KNOWN AS MARION HARTLEY; THE STATE OF NEW JERSEY, AND PERSONAL FINANCE COMPANY OF HACKENSACK, DEFENDANTS.

Superior Court of New Jersey, Chancery Division.

Decided December 18, 1953.

Mr. Reuben W. Massarsky, attorney for plaintiff.

Mr. Maurice E. Gold, guardian ad litem.

GRIMSHAW, J.S.C.

This is an action for the foreclosure of a mortgage. The validity…

2Cases cited3 opinions

  1. Matthiessen & Weichers Refining Co. v. McMahon's AdministratorSupreme Court of New Jersey · 1876
  2. Manufacturers Trust Co. v. PodvinSupreme Court of New Jersey · 1952
  3. Yauger v. SkinnerNew Jersey Court of Chancery · 1862

3Cited by3 opinions

  1. Swift & Co. v. SmigelNew Jersey Superior Court Appellate Division · 1971
  2. Gray v. Fitzgerald & Platt, Inc.Supreme Court of Connecticut · 1956
  3. Gray v. Fitzgerald & Platt, Inc.Supreme Court of Connecticut · 1956

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API