Legal Opinion
Swift & Co. v. Smigel
New Jersey Superior Court Appellate Division
Decided July 15, 1971PublishedCited by 5 opinions
1Opinion of the Court
115 N.J. Super. 391 (1971)
279 A.2d 895
SWIFT & COMPANY, A CORPORATION, PLAINTIFF-APPELLANT,
v.
ERWIN SMIGEL, EXECUTOR OF THE ESTATE OF JOSEPH OSCAR SMIGEL, ALSO KNOWN AS JOSEPH ASHER SMIGEL, DEFENDANT-RESPONDENT.
Superior Court of New Jersey, Appellate Division.
Argued March 25, 1971.
Decided July 15, 1971.
Before Judges CONFORD, KOLOVSKY and CARTON.
Mr. Sidney Krieger argued the cause for appellant.
Mr. John J. Baldino argued the cause for respondent (Messrs. Calissi, Gelman, Cuccio & Klinger, attorneys).
The opinion of the court was delivered by CONFORD, P.J.A.D.
Plaintiff Swift & Company instituted…
2Cases cited11 opinions
- Jordan v. DobbinsMassachusetts Supreme Judicial Court · 1877
- Gay v. WardSupreme Court of Connecticut · 1895
- Aitken, Son & Co. v. Lang's AdministratorCourt of Appeals of Kentucky · 1899
- Coombs v. WitteSupreme Court of New Jersey · 1928
- L. Teplitz Thrown Silk Co. v. RichPassaic County Circuit Court, N.J. · 1935
6 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by5 opinions
- First New Jersey Bank v. FLM Bus. MacHines, Inc.New Jersey Superior Court Appellate Division · 1974
- In Re Farmers' Co-Op of Arkansas & Oklahoma, Inc.United States Bankruptcy Court, W.D. Arkansas · 1984
- Housatonic Bank v. FlemingNew Jersey Superior Court Appellate Division · 1989
- Hackensack University Medical Center v. RossiNew Jersey Superior Court Appellate Division · 1998
- Swift & Company v. SmigelSupreme Court of New Jersey · 1972