Legal Opinion

Yauger v. Skinner

New Jersey Court of Chancery

Decided May 15, 1862PublishedCited by 3 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

The Chancellor.

The bill charges that, on the eighteenth of February, 1859, the complainant entered into a written agreement with Abraham Skinner, one of the defendants, by which Skinner covenanted to convey to the complainant a farm of one hundred and thirty-five acres, in the county of Morris, for the consideration of sis thousand seven hundred and fifty dollars, the title deed and possession of the premises to be delivered, and the consideration to be paid or secured on the of April then nest. On the fourth of April, in pursuance of the contract, the deed and possession of the premises was…

2Cases cited2 opinions

  1. Hart v. DeamerNew York Supreme Court · 1831
  2. In re ChristieNew York Court of Chancery · 1835

3Cited by3 opinions

  1. In Re Estate of BechtoldNew Jersey Superior Court Appellate Division · 1977
  2. South Orange Trust Co. v. HartleyNew Jersey Superior Court Appellate Division · 1953
  3. Mieczkowski v. MieczkowskiNew Jersey Court of Chancery · 1948

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API