Legal Opinion
Nordyke v. King
Court of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit
Decided June 1, 2012No. 07-15763PublishedCited by 61 opinions
1Opinion of the Court
Opinion by Judge GRABER; Concurrence by Judge O’SCANNLAIN; Concurrence by Judge IKUTA.
OPINION
GRABER, Circuit Judge:
The law and the facts relevant to Plaintiffs’ Second Amendment claim have evolved during the 12 years since this case first reached our court. See Nordyke v. King, 644 F.3d 776, 781-82 (9th Cir.2011) (“Nordyke V”) (“summarizing] this case’s long and tangled procedural history”).1 Under the present law and the present facts, we affirm the district court’s decision to dismiss the Second Amendment claim.2
Recently, the Supreme Court recognized an individual right under the Second…
2Cases cited14 opinions
- Williamson v. Lee Optical of Oklahoma, Inc.Supreme Court of the United States · 1955
- Perry Education Ass'n v. Perry Local Educators' Ass'nSupreme Court of the United States · 1983
- District of Columbia v. HellerSupreme Court of the United States · 2008
- McDonald v. City of ChicagoSupreme Court of the United States · 2010
- Engquist v. Oregon Department of AgricultureSupreme Court of the United States · 2008
9 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by61 opinions
- Kwong v. BloombergCourt of Appeals for the Second Circuit · 2013
- John Teixeira v. County of AlamedaCourt of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit · 2017
- Hightower v. City of BostonCourt of Appeals for the First Circuit · 2012
- Edward Peruta v. County of San DiegoCourt of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit · 2014
- Ivan Pena v. Stephen LindleyCourt of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit · 2018
56 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.