Legal Opinion
Abrams v. Communications Workers of America
District Court, District of Columbia
Decided April 16, 1993No. Civ. A. 87-2816 (RCL)PublishedCited by 6 opinions
1Opinion of the Court
ORDER AND JUDGMENT
LAMBERTH, District Judge.
This case comes before the court on plaintiffs and defendant’s cross motions for summary judgment. For the reasons stated in the Memorandum Opinion issued this date, it is hereby ORDERED that:
1. Plaintiffs’ Motion for Summary Judgment is GRANTED in part and DENIED in part. The court GRANTS plaintiffs’ motion only as to its claim that CWA’s arbitration policy violates CWA’s duty of fair representation toward plaintiffs. The court DENIES plaintiffs’ motion in all other respects.
2. Defendant’s Motion for Summary Judgment is GRANTED in part and DENIED in…
2Cases cited17 opinions
- Vaca v. SipesSupreme Court of the United States · 1967
- At&T Technologies, Inc. v. Communications WorkersSupreme Court of the United States · 1986
- DelCostello v. International Brotherhood of TeamstersSupreme Court of the United States · 1983
- Steele v. Louisville & Nashville RailroadSupreme Court of the United States · 1944
- Abood v. Detroit Board of EducationSupreme Court of the United States · 1977
12 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by6 opinions
- Kenneth Abrams v. Communications Workers of America, an Unincorporated Labor OrganizationCourt of Appeals for the D.C. Circuit · 1995
- United Food and Commercial Workers Local 951, Afl-Cio and Clc v. Phillip Mulder Charles Buck and Leon GibbonsCourt of Appeals for the Sixth Circuit · 1994
- Abrams v. Communications Workers of AmericaDistrict Court, District of Columbia · 1998
- Abrams v. Communications Workers of AmericaDistrict Court, District of Columbia · 1993
- Kenneth Abrams v. Communications Workers of America, an Unincorporated Labor OrganizationCourt of Appeals for the D.C. Circuit · 1995
1 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.