Legal Opinion

Gale Manufacturing Co. v. King

Supreme Court of Kansas

Decided February 8, 1919No. 21,896PublishedCited by 5 opinions

Appeal from Sumner district court; Oliver P. Fuller, judge.

1Opinion of the Court

The opinion of the court was delivered by

Dawson, J.:

The plaintiff sued the defendants upon a written contract for the price of a “Spalding Deep Tilling Machine” — some new contrivance for cultivating corn. The defense was fraudulent representations as to contents of the contract and want of opportunity to read it, and consequent reliance upon plaintiff’s false representations as to its contents.

That such a defense may be maintained, if supported by clear, decided, and satisfactory evidence (Fritts v. Reidel, 101 Kan. 68, 71, 165 Pac. 671), is settled law in this state. (Insurance Co. v.…

2Cases cited4 opinions

  1. Griesa v. ThomasSupreme Court of Kansas · 1916
  2. Tanton v. MartinSupreme Court of Kansas · 1909
  3. Fritts v. ReidelSupreme Court of Kansas · 1917
  4. State Life-Insurance v. JohnsonSupreme Court of Kansas · 1906

3Cited by5 opinions

  1. Stapleton v. HartmanSupreme Court of Kansas · 1953
  2. Bank of America, N.A. v. NarulaCourt of Appeals of Kansas · 2011
  3. Brenard Manufacturing Co. v. ScrantonSupreme Court of Kansas · 1924
  4. Ford Motor Co. v. PearsonCourt of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit · 1930
  5. Boxer v. Watchorn Oil & Gas Co.Supreme Court of Kansas · 1926

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API