Legal Opinion

State v. . Nelson

Supreme Court of North Carolina

Decided December 19, 1930PublishedCited by 22 opinions

1Opinion of the CourtBeogdbN, J.

Tbe paramount question of law presented by the record is whether the cross-examination of character witnesses for defendant was within the law.

The court instructed the jury in two instances that the type of cross-examination pursued was competent only to discredit or impeach the witness himself. In other instances no instruction whatever was given. Cross-examination of a witness is not a matter of privilege or grace, but a matter of right, and is one of the most effective means known to the law for the ascertainment of truth and for testing the soundness or fallacy of the declarations of a…

2Cases cited12 opinions

  1. State v. . EflerSupreme Court of North Carolina · 1881
  2. State v. . Harvey PerkinsSupreme Court of North Carolina · 1872
  3. State v. . MaslinSupreme Court of North Carolina · 1928
  4. Milling Co. v. . Highway CommissionSupreme Court of North Carolina · 1925
  5. State v. . AustinSupreme Court of North Carolina · 1891

7 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by22 opinions

  1. State v. WilliamsSupreme Court of North Carolina · 1971
  2. State v. LooneySupreme Court of North Carolina · 1978
  3. State v. . LitteralSupreme Court of North Carolina · 1947
  4. State v. LitteralSupreme Court of North Carolina · 1947
  5. Citizens Bank & Trust Co. v. Reid Motor Co.Supreme Court of North Carolina · 1939

17 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API