State v. . Austin
Supreme Court of North Carolina
This an appeal from August Term, 1890, of Mecklen-burg Criminal Court, Meares, J., presiding. The indictment was found in Union County, and removed for trial. The facts are sufficiently stated in the opinion.
1Opinion of the Court
Claek, J.:
The defendants were indicted for'fornication and adultery.
Exception 1. — One Helms, a witness for the State, testified that he met the male defendant one night about two hundred yards from the female defendant’s house, going in the direction of her house, and defendant told him he was going to Coleman Stewart’s to meet Elliott (an Alliance lecturer), and when this .matter was tried before the Alliance the defendant denied telling him so and denied meeting him. To this defendant objected. There was evidence by many witnesses of the defendant Austin making nocturnal visits to the…
2Cases cited11 opinions
- State v. . Harvey PerkinsSupreme Court of North Carolina · 1872
- State v. . JacobsSupreme Court of North Carolina · 1890
- State v. . ChristmasSupreme Court of North Carolina · 1888
- State v. . BullardSupreme Court of North Carolina · 1888
- Jackson v. Commissioners of Greene CountySupreme Court of North Carolina · 1877
6 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by14 opinions
- State v. KeehnSupreme Court of Kansas · 1911
- Brown v. StateTennessee Supreme Court · 1948
- Ferrell v. . HalesSupreme Court of North Carolina · 1896
- State v. . NelsonSupreme Court of North Carolina · 1930
- State v. RichardsonIdaho Supreme Court · 1935
9 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.