Legal Opinion

Milling Co. v. . Highway Commission

Supreme Court of North Carolina

Decided December 16, 1925PublishedCited by 19 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

Proceedings instituted before the clerk to assess damages in favor of the petitioner on account of the taking of petitioner's property for a State highway, and damages to other property not taken. From a judgment on a jury verdict in favor of respondent, petitioner appeals. No error.

The petitioner is the owner of certain properties situated on Rocky River in the counties of Stanly and Anson. On this property is situated a roller mill and mills, for meal, feed and other grain products, operated by water power supplied by dams across Rocky River. At the point where the mills are situated there…

2Cases cited51 opinions

  1. State v. Exum.Supreme Court of North Carolina · 1905
  2. White Ex Rel. White v. HinesSupreme Court of North Carolina · 1921
  3. Resurrection Gold Min. Co. v. Fortune Gold Min. Co.Court of Appeals for the Eighth Circuit · 1904
  4. Brown v. . Power Co.Supreme Court of North Carolina · 1905
  5. Kornegay v. Atlantic Coast Line RailroadSupreme Court of North Carolina · 1911

46 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by19 opinions

  1. State v. . BealSupreme Court of North Carolina · 1930
  2. Barnes v. North Carolina State Highway CommissionSupreme Court of North Carolina · 1959
  3. State v. BealSupreme Court of North Carolina · 1930
  4. State v. . LitteralSupreme Court of North Carolina · 1947
  5. State v. HartSupreme Court of North Carolina · 1954

14 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API