Legal Opinion
Wieneke v. Home Mutual Insurance Co.
Court of Appeals of Minnesota
Decided December 23, 1986No. C7-86-1093PublishedCited by 17 opinions
1Opinion of the Court
OPINION
PARKER, Judge.
On cross-motions for summary judgment, the trial court found that Anthony Wieneke was not entitled to coverage under the no-fault and uninsured motorist provisions of his automobile insurance policy for injuries he sustained in a fight. We affirm.
FACTS
In the late afternoon of June 11, 1982, Anthony Wieneke and Douglas Beedle were each driving east on Shepard Road in St. Paul. Each accuses the other of driving improperly. Eventually, the two men stopped their cars next to one another at a stoplight. Beedle got out of his car and walked to Wieneke’s car, where the two…
2Cases cited5 opinions
- Holm v. Mutual Service Casualty Insurance Co.Supreme Court of Minnesota · 1977
- Tlougan v. Auto-Owners Insurance Co.Supreme Court of Minnesota · 1981
- Waldbillig v. State Farm Mutual Automobile Insurance Co.Supreme Court of Minnesota · 1982
- Fire & Casualty Insurance Co. of Connecticut v. Illinois Farmers Insurance Co.Court of Appeals of Minnesota · 1984
- Meric v. Mid-Century Insurance Co.Court of Appeals of Minnesota · 1984
3Cited by17 opinions
- Allstate Ins. Co. v. SkeltonSupreme Court of Alabama · 1996
- Continental Western Insurance Co. v. KlugSupreme Court of Minnesota · 1987
- Edwards v. State Farm Mutual Automobile Insurance Co.Court of Appeals of Minnesota · 1986
- Petersen v. CroftCourt of Appeals of Minnesota · 1989
- Wilson v. State Farm Mutual Automobile Insurance Co.Court of Appeals of Minnesota · 1990
12 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.