Legal Opinion

Theer v. Philip Carey Co.

New Jersey Superior Court Appellate Division

Decided August 4, 1992PublishedCited by 3 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

259 N.J. Super. 40 (1992)

611 A.2d 148

ROSE MARIE THEER, INDIVIDUALLY AND AS EXECUTRIX OF THE ESTATE OF JOSEPH THEER, PLAINTIFF-APPELLANT/CROSS-RESPONDENT,

v.

PHILIP CAREY CO., ET ALS.,[1] DEFENDANTS-RESPONDENTS/CROSS-APPELLANTS. ROSE MARIE THEER, PLAINTIFF-APPELLANT/CROSS-RESPONDENT,

v.

PHILIP CAREY CO., ET ALS., DEFENDANTS-RESPONDENTS/CROSS-APPELLANTS.

Superior Court of New Jersey, Appellate Division.

Argued April 13, 1992.

Decided August 4, 1992.

Before Judges PETRELLA, ARNOLD M. STEIN and KESTIN.

Karl Asch argued the cause for appellant/cross respondent (Karl Asch, P.A., attorney; Karl Asch of…

2Cases cited14 opinions

  1. Ayers v. Township of JacksonSupreme Court of New Jersey · 1987
  2. Kelly v. GwinnellSupreme Court of New Jersey · 1984
  3. Freund v. Cellofilm Properties, Inc.Supreme Court of New Jersey · 1981
  4. Menth v. Breeze Corporation, Inc.Supreme Court of New Jersey · 1950
  5. State v. HarveySupreme Court of New Jersey · 1990

9 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by3 opinions

  1. Theer v. Philip Carey Co.Supreme Court of New Jersey · 1993
  2. De Milio v. SchragerNew Jersey Superior Court Appellate Division · 1995
  3. Sinclair v. Merck & Co., Inc.New Jersey Superior Court Appellate Division · 2007

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API