Theer v. Philip Carey Co.
New Jersey Superior Court Appellate Division
1Opinion of the Court
259 N.J. Super. 40 (1992)
611 A.2d 148
ROSE MARIE THEER, INDIVIDUALLY AND AS EXECUTRIX OF THE ESTATE OF JOSEPH THEER, PLAINTIFF-APPELLANT/CROSS-RESPONDENT,
v.
PHILIP CAREY CO., ET ALS.,[1] DEFENDANTS-RESPONDENTS/CROSS-APPELLANTS. ROSE MARIE THEER, PLAINTIFF-APPELLANT/CROSS-RESPONDENT,
v.
PHILIP CAREY CO., ET ALS., DEFENDANTS-RESPONDENTS/CROSS-APPELLANTS.
Superior Court of New Jersey, Appellate Division.
Argued April 13, 1992.
Decided August 4, 1992.
Before Judges PETRELLA, ARNOLD M. STEIN and KESTIN.
Karl Asch argued the cause for appellant/cross respondent (Karl Asch, P.A., attorney; Karl Asch of…
2Cases cited14 opinions
- Ayers v. Township of JacksonSupreme Court of New Jersey · 1987
- Kelly v. GwinnellSupreme Court of New Jersey · 1984
- Freund v. Cellofilm Properties, Inc.Supreme Court of New Jersey · 1981
- Menth v. Breeze Corporation, Inc.Supreme Court of New Jersey · 1950
- State v. HarveySupreme Court of New Jersey · 1990
9 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by3 opinions
- Theer v. Philip Carey Co.Supreme Court of New Jersey · 1993
- De Milio v. SchragerNew Jersey Superior Court Appellate Division · 1995
- Sinclair v. Merck & Co., Inc.New Jersey Superior Court Appellate Division · 2007