Legal Opinion
Sinclair v. Merck & Co., Inc.
New Jersey Superior Court Appellate Division
Decided January 16, 2007PublishedCited by 3 opinions
1Opinion of the Court
913 A.2d 832 (2007)
389 N.J. Super. 493
Phyllis SINCLAIR and Joseph Murray, Individually and For All Others Similarly Situated, Plaintiffs-Appellants,
v.
MERCK & CO., INC., Defendant-Respondent.
Superior Court of New Jersey, Appellate Division.
Argued September 26, 2006.
Decided January 16, 2007.
Esther Berezofsky, argued the cause for appellants (Williams Cuker Berezofsky, attorneys, Cherry Hill; Ms. Berezofsky, Elizabeth Cabraser (Lieff Cabraser Heimann & Bernstein) of the California bar, admitted pro hac vice, San Francisco, CA, Wendy Fleishman (Lieff Cabraser Heimann & Bernstein) of the N.Y. bar,…
2Cases cited20 opinions
- Printing Mart-Morristown v. Sharp Electronics Corp.Supreme Court of New Jersey · 1989
- Gennari v. Weichert Co. RealtorsSupreme Court of New Jersey · 1997
- Ayers v. Township of JacksonSupreme Court of New Jersey · 1987
- Claude Cimino v. Raymark Industries, Inc., Pittsburgh Corning Corporation and Asbestos Corporation LimitedCourt of Appeals for the Fifth Circuit · 1998
- Mauro v. Raymark Industries, Inc.Supreme Court of New Jersey · 1989
15 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by3 opinions
- Sinclair v. Merck & Co., Inc.Supreme Court of New Jersey · 2008
- Sinclair v. Merck & Co., Inc.Supreme Court of New Jersey · 2008
- Sinclair v. Merck & Co., Inc.Supreme Court of New Jersey · 2008