Legal Opinion

Jones v. Iverson

California Supreme Court

Decided December 22, 1900No. S.F. 613PublishedCited by 13 opinions

The facts are stated in the opinion.

1Opinion of the Court

CHIPMAN, C.

Defendants demurred to the complaint on several grounds; the demurrer was sustained, and, plaintiff declining to amend, defendants had judgment, from which plaintiff appeals.

1. Eespondeni® object to the consideration of the appeal on the ground of the insufficiency of the notice. It is as follows:

“[Title ’Court and Cause.]
“Please take notice that the plaintiff in the above-entitled action hereby appeals to the supreme court of the state of California from said judgment made and entered in said action in favor of the defendants and against the plaintiff.”

The notice does not give the…

2Cases cited3 opinions

  1. People ex rel. Pierce v. MorrillCalifornia Supreme Court · 1864
  2. Whitehead v. SweetCalifornia Supreme Court · 1899
  3. Salmon v. WilsonCalifornia Supreme Court · 1871

3Cited by13 opinions

  1. People v. LimCalifornia Supreme Court · 1941
  2. Bishop-Babcock-Becker Co. v. Estes Drug Co.Supreme Court of Oklahoma · 1917
  3. J. P. Armstrong v. AdamsCalifornia Court of Appeal · 1929
  4. Wichmann v. City of PlacervilleCalifornia Supreme Court · 1905
  5. San Francisco Paving Co. v. FairfieldCalifornia Supreme Court · 1901

8 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API