Peterson v. Lund
Utah Supreme Court
Appeal from District Court, Seventh District, Sanpete County; George Christensen, Judge. Action by Parley P. Peterson and another against Peter Lund. From a judgment for plaintiffs, defendant appeals.
1Opinion of the CourtFrick, J.
The plaintiffs, in substance, allege that at all times mentioned in the complaint and at the commencement of the action, they were the owners of certain lands in Sanpete county, Utah, describing them; that said lands were arid and without irrigation, sterile and nonproductive; that near the eastern boundary of said lands there were two springs, commonly known as the Shumway Springs, the waters of which the plaintiffs and their predecessors in interest had impounded and used for more than 30 years to irrigate said lands, and had, by the use of the water from said springs on said lands,…
2Cases cited12 opinions
- Katz v. WalkinshawCalifornia Supreme Court · 1903
- Miller v. Bay Cities Water Co.California Supreme Court · 1910
- Barton v. Riverside Water Co.California Supreme Court · 1909
- Sullivan v. Northern Spy Mining Co.Utah Supreme Court · 1895
- Sowards v. MeagherUtah Supreme Court · 1910
7 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by15 opinions
- Horne v. Utah Oil Refining Co.Utah Supreme Court · 1921
- Wrathall v. JohnsonUtah Supreme Court · 1935
- Riordan v. WestwoodUtah Supreme Court · 1949
- Justesen v. OlsenUtah Supreme Court · 1935
- Snake Creek Mining & Tunnel Co. v. Midway Irrigation Co.Supreme Court of the United States · 1923
10 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.