Legal Opinion

Schmidt v. Turnbuckle Oil Co.

Supreme Court of Oklahoma

Decided December 12, 1922No. 10918PublishedCited by 6 opinions

1Opinion of the CourtNicholson, J.

This was an action on a promissory note'brought by the defendant in error Hannora C. Halligan, as plaintiff, against the Turnbuckie Oil Company, J. Fred Miles, George Schmidt, and O. U. Schlegel. as defendants. The petition was in the usual form and prayed judgment against said defendants for the sum of $4,000.40, and the further sum of $4110.04, attorney’s fee. After the action was instituted, the defendant George Schmidt died and the cause was revived against Sophronia E. Schmidt, admin-istratrix of his estate, who filed an amended answer, the pertinent portions of which are as follows:

“Come…

2Cases cited12 opinions

  1. Mathews v. SniggsSupreme Court of Oklahoma · 1919
  2. Cottle v. ColeSupreme Court of Iowa · 1866
  3. Greene v. McAuleySupreme Court of Kansas · 1905
  4. Farwell v. TylerSupreme Court of Iowa · 1858
  5. Wright v. BachellerSupreme Court of Kansas · 1876

7 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by6 opinions

  1. Owens v. State Ex Rel. MotherseadSupreme Court of Oklahoma · 1928
  2. Clark v. HerbertSupreme Court of Oklahoma · 1928
  3. McAlester v. Bank of McAlesterSupreme Court of Oklahoma · 1923
  4. Stocker v. Dobyns-Lantz Hdwe. Co.Supreme Court of Oklahoma · 1924
  5. Pine v. BradleySupreme Court of Oklahoma · 1940

1 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API