Legal Opinion
Hudson Rug Refinishing & Cleaning Corp. v. Prime Mfg. Co.
Court of Appeals for the Seventh Circuit
Decided October 28, 1940No. 7359PublishedCited by 8 opinions
1Opinion of the Court
LINDLEY, District Judge.
Plaintiff averred in its complaint in the District Court that on February 19, 1937, it contracted to buy of defendant, certain equipment and machinery constituting when installed, a rug drying machine f.o.b. Milwaukee, Wisconsin, for $5,400; that the dryer, warranted to possess a specific capacity for removal of moisture, was to be erected under the supervision of defendant and, if demonstration of performance of the contract should be requested, defendant would make tests, reserving the right to make any and all changes necessary to fulfill the warranty. It was…
2Cases cited6 opinions
- Ochs v. . WoodsNew York Court of Appeals · 1917
- Barrett Co. v. Panther Rubber Mfg. Co.Court of Appeals for the First Circuit · 1928
- Gotham Nat. Bank of New York v. Sharood Co.Court of Appeals for the Second Circuit · 1928
- Taylor v. . SaxeNew York Court of Appeals · 1892
- Waldman Produce, Inc. v. Frigidaire Corp.Appellate Terms of the Supreme Court of New York · 1935
1 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by8 opinions
- United Air Lines, Inc. v. Janice Wiener and Catherine B. Nollenberger (Excluding Faith C. Paris), United States of America v. Janice WienerCourt of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit · 1964
- Caen v. FeldSupreme Court of Missouri · 1963
- Wayne v. New York Life Ins. Co.Court of Appeals for the Eighth Circuit · 1942
- Nollenberger v. United Air Lines, Inc.District Court, S.D. California · 1963
- Burke v. ThomasDistrict Court, D. Alaska · 1955
3 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.