Legal Opinion

Gotham Nat. Bank of New York v. Sharood Co.

Court of Appeals for the Second Circuit

Decided January 16, 1928No. 57PublishedCited by 9 opinions

1Opinion of the CourtSwan, Circuit Judge

(after stating the facts as above). For an understanding of the questions of law presented by this record, it will be necessary to state the facts in some detail. Teco, Inc., was largely indebt-. ed to the bank for moneys loaned to it to finance the purchase of great quantities of army merchandise imported from France for sale. As security for the indebtedness, such merchandise was lodged in storage ' warehouses in New York City, to be released upon authorization of the bank, which held nonnegotiable warehouse receipts therefor issued in the name of the bank. The copartnership of Muller &…

2Cases cited23 opinions

  1. California Bank v. KennedySupreme Court of the United States · 1897
  2. National Bank v. CaseSupreme Court of the United States · 1879
  3. Davis v. PatrickSupreme Court of the United States · 1891
  4. Emerson v. SlaterSupreme Court of the United States · 1860
  5. Aldrich v. Chemical National BankSupreme Court of the United States · 1900

18 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by9 opinions

  1. Hudson Rug Refinishing & Cleaning Corp. v. Prime Mfg. Co.Court of Appeals for the Seventh Circuit · 1940
  2. Greene County Nat. Farm Loan Ass'n v. Federal Land BankDistrict Court, W.D. Kentucky · 1944
  3. Dunn v. McCoyCourt of Appeals for the Third Circuit · 1940
  4. Wilson v. Harburney Oil Co.Court of Appeals for the Tenth Circuit · 1937
  5. Ibarra-Perez v. HowardDistrict Court, D. Arizona · 2020

4 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API