Legal Opinion
Henderson v. Electric Loop Land Co.
California Court of Appeal
Decided February 1, 1929No. Docket No. 6575PublishedCited by 2 opinions
1Opinion of the Court
BURROUGHS, J., pro tem.
These three cases were consolidated for trial and are brought here upon one record.
The plaintiff, as the administratrix of the estate of Edward James Henderson, deceased, sought to recover from the defendant Electric Loop Land Company $13,336.39; from the defendant Richmond Annex Land Company $12,202.54; from the defendant Havenscourt Company $10,925.11. In each one of the three cases the court gave judgment for the defendant, and from said judgment the plaintiff appeals.
The cause of action is the same in each case. It is alleged as the foundation of the several…
2Cases cited18 opinions
- Carr v. HamiltonSupreme Court of the United States · 1889
- Etchas v. OrenaCalifornia Supreme Court · 1900
- Moore v. GouldCalifornia Supreme Court · 1907
- Nashville Trust Co. v. BankTennessee Supreme Court · 1892
- People v. Cal. Safe Deposit & Tr. Co.California Supreme Court · 1914
13 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by2 opinions
- Downey v. HumphreysCalifornia Court of Appeal · 1951
- Hampton Roads Fire & Marine Insurance v. Coburn Motor Car Co.Supreme Court of Virginia · 1932