Legal Opinion

Gilbert v. Easterling

Supreme Court of South Carolina

Decided July 5, 1950No. 16378PublishedCited by 5 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

Baker, Chief Justice.

In 1947, James M. Easterling and Leland Richard Easter-ling, appearing in the caption as the sole respondents, although as will hereinafter be seen, Eoraine Easterling is also a respondent and is the one chiefly interested, purchased from the appellants, Verlie Gilbert and Theodosia Gilbert, a tract of land in Darlington County containing 430 acres, more or less, the purchase price being $10,000.00. At the time of the conveyance of this land to said James M. Easter-ling and Leland Richard Easterling, they paid $1,000.00, and the balance of $9,000.00 was secured by a…

2Cases cited4 opinions

  1. Planter's Bank v. Lummus Cotton Gin Co.Supreme Court of South Carolina · 1925
  2. Mallory v. AgeeSupreme Court of Alabama · 1932
  3. Heath v. HaileSupreme Court of South Carolina · 1896
  4. Saye v. HillSupreme Court of South Carolina · 1915

3Cited by5 opinions

  1. Julia Nicholson v. Altona Corporation, and v. I. Realty CorporationCourt of Appeals for the Third Circuit · 1963
  2. Carroll v. BrittSupreme Court of South Carolina · 1955
  3. American Telephone & Telegraph Co. v. MullerDistrict Court, D. South Carolina · 1968
  4. Carroll v. BrittSupreme Court of South Carolina · 1955
  5. McElveen v. BrunsonSupreme Court of South Carolina · 1982

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API