In re Loza
California Court of Appeal
1Opinion of the Court
Opinion
KIN, J. *
INTRODUCTION
A jury convicted petitioner Adam Loza of two counts of first degree murder and two counts of attempted robbery. The jury found true the Penal Code section 190.2 1 special-circumstance allegations that the murders were committed while petitioner was engaged in the attempted commission of a robbery or burglary. In accordance with the section 190.2 robbery/burglary special-circumstance findings, the trial court sentenced petitioner to consecutive prison terms of life without the possibility of parole on his murder convictions.
On direct appeal, petitioner argued, among…
2Cases cited10 opinions
- Enmund v. FloridaSupreme Court of the United States · 1982
- Tison v. ArizonaSupreme Court of the United States · 1987
- In Re ClarkCalifornia Supreme Court · 1993
- People v. ClarkCalifornia Supreme Court · 2016
- People v. BanksCalifornia Supreme Court · 2015
5 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by24 opinions
- In re Tyrone A. Miller On Habeas Corpus, California Court of Appeal, 5th District2017
- In re Taylor, California Court of Appeal, 5th District2019
- In re Bennett, California Court of Appeal, 5th District2018
- In re Ramirez, California Court of Appeal, 5th District2019
- (HC) Martinez-Costa v. PallaresDistrict Court, E.D. California · 2021
19 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.