Legal Opinion

People v. Banks

California Supreme Court

Decided July 9, 2015No. S213819PublishedCited by 281 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

Opinion

WEEDEGAR, J.

In 1990, the voters passed Proposition 115, which adopted a wide range of criminal justice reforms, including extending death penalty eligibility to “major participants]” in felony murders. (Pen. Code, § 190.2, subd. (d) (section 190.2(d)), added by initiative, Primary Elec. (June 5, 1990) Prop. 115, § 10; see Raven v. Deukmejian (1990) 52 Cal.3d 336, 342-345 [276 Cal.Rptr. 326, 801 P.2d 1077].) The issue before us is under what circumstances an accomplice who lacks the intent to kill may qualify as a major participant so as to be statutorily eligible for the death penalty.

S…

2Cases cited29 opinions

  1. Jackson v. VirginiaSupreme Court of the United States · 1979
  2. Gregg v. GeorgiaSupreme Court of the United States · 1976
  3. Lockett v. OhioSupreme Court of the United States · 1978
  4. Ring v. ArizonaSupreme Court of the United States · 2002
  5. Graham v. FloridaSupreme Court of the United States · 2010

24 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by281 opinions

  1. People v. ClarkCalifornia Supreme Court · 2016
  2. People v. StrongCalifornia Supreme Court · 2022
  3. People v. GonzalezCalifornia Supreme Court · 2018
  4. In re Tyrone A. Miller On Habeas Corpus, California Court of Appeal, 5th District2017
  5. People v. CurielCalifornia Supreme Court · 2023

276 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API