People v. Banks
California Supreme Court
1Opinion of the Court
Opinion
WEEDEGAR, J.
In 1990, the voters passed Proposition 115, which adopted a wide range of criminal justice reforms, including extending death penalty eligibility to “major participants]” in felony murders. (Pen. Code, § 190.2, subd. (d) (section 190.2(d)), added by initiative, Primary Elec. (June 5, 1990) Prop. 115, § 10; see Raven v. Deukmejian (1990) 52 Cal.3d 336, 342-345 [276 Cal.Rptr. 326, 801 P.2d 1077].) The issue before us is under what circumstances an accomplice who lacks the intent to kill may qualify as a major participant so as to be statutorily eligible for the death penalty.
S…
2Cases cited29 opinions
- Jackson v. VirginiaSupreme Court of the United States · 1979
- Gregg v. GeorgiaSupreme Court of the United States · 1976
- Lockett v. OhioSupreme Court of the United States · 1978
- Ring v. ArizonaSupreme Court of the United States · 2002
- Graham v. FloridaSupreme Court of the United States · 2010
24 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by281 opinions
- People v. ClarkCalifornia Supreme Court · 2016
- People v. StrongCalifornia Supreme Court · 2022
- People v. GonzalezCalifornia Supreme Court · 2018
- In re Tyrone A. Miller On Habeas Corpus, California Court of Appeal, 5th District2017
- People v. CurielCalifornia Supreme Court · 2023
276 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.