Legal Opinion
In re Ramirez
California Court of Appeal, 5th District
Decided February 20, 2019No. F075897PublishedCited by 35 opinions
1Opinion of the CourtHill, P.J.
*755*388Arthur Espindola Ramirez (petitioner) seeks to have his felony-murder special circumstance vacated based on California Supreme Court authorities decided after his convictions became final. We conclude he is entitled to that relief.
*389FACTS AND PROCEDURAL HISTORY 1
"I. The Prosecution.
"Eustacio [surname omitted] testified that he was 13 years old in January of 1996. He lived with his parents and [petitioner], who was then aged 19. Eustacio belonged to a 'Sureno' (southern California) street gang. His best friend was 16-year-old Josh [surname omitted]. On or about January 14, 1996, the…
2Cases cited28 opinions
- Jackson v. VirginiaSupreme Court of the United States · 1979
- In Re WINSHIPSupreme Court of the United States · 1970
- Enmund v. FloridaSupreme Court of the United States · 1982
- Tison v. ArizonaSupreme Court of the United States · 1987
- People v. WaidlaCalifornia Supreme Court · 2000
23 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by35 opinions
- People v. StrongCalifornia Supreme Court · 2022
- In re Taylor, California Court of Appeal, 5th District2019
- (HC) Bradley v. KiblerDistrict Court, E.D. California · 2023
- In re McDowellCalifornia Court of Appeal · 2020
- In re McDowellCalifornia Court of Appeal · 2020
30 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.