Legal Opinion

Smith v. Fladstol

Montana Supreme Court

Decided March 21, 1991No. 90-474PublishedCited by 6 opinions

1Opinion of the CourtJustice Trieweiler

La Rue Smith appeals from a judgment entered in the District Court, Eighth Judicial District, Cascade County, denying attorney fees and costs. We affirm the District Court.

The dispositive issue in this case is whether substantial evidence existed to support the District Court’s finding that attorney Smith was engaged to perform limited duties and was paid in full for those services.

Kespondent Nancy Fladstol contacted Smith by telephone on December 17,1986 about retaining Smith as her attorney. An appointment was scheduled for the following day. Mrs. Fladstol informed Smith of pending…

2Cases cited2 opinions

  1. In Re the Marriage of RolfeMontana Supreme Court · 1985
  2. Clinton v. MillerMontana Supreme Court · 1951

3Cited by6 opinions

  1. State v. FlackMontana Supreme Court · 1993
  2. Kaeding v. WR Grace & Co.-Conn.Montana Supreme Court · 1998
  3. VRT, INC. v. Dutton-Lainson Co.Nebraska Supreme Court · 1995
  4. Crane Creek Ranch, Inc. v. CresapMontana Supreme Court · 2004
  5. Kaeding v. WR Grace & Co.-Conn.Montana Supreme Court · 1998

1 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API