Legal Opinion

Kaeding v. WR Grace & Co.-Conn.

Montana Supreme Court

Decided June 23, 1998No. 97-598PublishedCited by 31 opinions

1Opinion of the CourtJustice Leaphart

¶1 Appellants Donald M. and Louise E. Kaeding (the Kaedings) appeal from the order of the Montana Nineteenth Judicial District Court, Lincoln County, granting summary judgment in favor of Respondent W.R. Grace & Company (W.R. Grace). We affirm.

¶2 We restate the issues on appeal as follows:

¶3 1. Did the District Court err in holding that the Kaedings’ claims were not filed within the statute of limitations and in granting summary judgment for W.R. Grace?

¶4 2. Did the District Court err in considering the September 1, 1992 letter from Dr. Alan Whitehouse (Dr. Whitehouse) to the Kaedings’…

2Cases cited7 opinions

  1. Bruner v. Yellowstone CountyMontana Supreme Court · 1995
  2. Mead v. M.S.B., Inc.Montana Supreme Court · 1994
  3. Hando v. PPG Industries, Inc.Montana Supreme Court · 1989
  4. Unland v. City of LincolnNebraska Supreme Court · 1995
  5. Williams v. State Medical Oxygen & Supply, Inc.Montana Supreme Court · 1994

2 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by31 opinions

  1. Orr v. StateMontana Supreme Court · 2004
  2. Arlington Funding Services, Inc. v. GeigelSupreme Court of The Virgin Islands · 2009
  3. Nelson v. NelsonMontana Supreme Court · 2002
  4. Christian v. Atlantic Richfield Co.Montana Supreme Court · 2015
  5. In Re Subpoena Issued to Commodity Futures Trading CommissionDistrict Court, District of Columbia · 2005

26 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API