Legal Opinion · Dissent

Burmek v. Miller Brewing Co.

Wisconsin Supreme Court

Decided December 3, 1957Published

1DissentSteinle, J.

Analysis of the legislative history of the 1953 amendment of sec. 330.19 (5), Stats., indicates that said amendment was enacted to sanction situations comparable to those in such cases as Budke v. Holvick (1949), 255 Wis. 293, 38 N. W. (2d) 479, Trapino v. Trapino (1951), 260 Wis. 137, 50 N. W. (2d) 467, and Ullman v. Freye (1953), 263 Wis. 199, 56 N. W. (2d) 821, wherein this court held that the failure of technical observance of the two-year notice of injury provided in the statute was not fatal. In the Budke Case it was held that the notice of injury, although technically defective because…

2Cases cited11 opinions

  1. Gatzow v. BueningWisconsin Supreme Court · 1900
  2. Malloy v. Chicago & Northwestern Railway Co.Wisconsin Supreme Court · 1901
  3. Meisenheimer v. KelloggWisconsin Supreme Court · 1900
  4. Maurer v. Northwestern Iron Co.Wisconsin Supreme Court · 1912
  5. Olson v. Stella Cheese Co.Wisconsin Supreme Court · 1948

6 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API