Legal Opinion

Peterson v. Gales

Wisconsin Supreme Court

Decided October 12, 1926PublishedCited by 20 opinions

1Opinion of the CourtOwen, J.

This action was brought to restrain the defendant Arthur C. Gales from erecting on lot 20 of block 2 of Owen’s subdivision to the city of Racine a building in violation of a restrictive covenant affecting the use of said lot. A partition deed between the heirs of the proprietor of said subdivision contained the following covenant:

“It is also agreed, and all the parties hereto agree not to build on Owen avenue any house with a foundation wall nearer than twenty-four feet from the street line. Also not to build on said avenue 'any house costing less than $1,500. . . . Also agreed that…

2Cases cited4 opinions

  1. Ward v. Prospect Manor Corp.Wisconsin Supreme Court · 1926
  2. Bennett v. KeehnWisconsin Supreme Court · 1886
  3. Roberts v. GerberWisconsin Supreme Court · 1925
  4. Schneider v. EckhoffWisconsin Supreme Court · 1926

3Cited by20 opinions

  1. Rozny v. MarnulIllinois Supreme Court · 1969
  2. Williams v. PolgarMichigan Supreme Court · 1974
  3. Sadtler v. Jackson-Cross Co.Superior Court of Pennsylvania · 1991
  4. Thodos v. ShirkSupreme Court of Iowa · 1956
  5. Hawkins v. Oakland Title Insurance & Guaranty Co.California Court of Appeal · 1958

15 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API