Legal Opinion

Wight v. Baltimore & Ohio Railroad

Court of Appeals of Maryland

Decided June 7, 1924PublishedCited by 15 opinions

1Opinion of the CourtOeeutt, J.

The single question presented by this appeal is whether chapter 399 of the Acts of 1906, codified as sections 11 to 17 inclusive of article 8 of the Code of P. G. L. of Md., conflicts with any provision of the State or Federal Constitution, and that question arises in this way:

On duly 30th, 1923, the Baltimore and Ohio> Eailroad Company owed Wm. L. Miller, one of its employees, $21.50 in earned wages and on that day Miller offered to sell and assign his claim for that amount to the appellants in this case for $20. They accepted his offer and he accordingly assigned the claim to them, and they…

2Cases cited9 opinions

  1. Gundling v. ChicagoSupreme Court of the United States · 1900
  2. Mutual Loan Co. v. MartellSupreme Court of the United States · 1911
  3. Schaake v. DolleySupreme Court of Kansas · 1911
  4. People v. StokesIllinois Supreme Court · 1917
  5. Shaffer v. Union Mining Co.Court of Appeals of Maryland · 1880

4 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by15 opinions

  1. Dasch v. JacksonCourt of Appeals of Maryland · 1936
  2. Howard Sports Daily, Inc. v. Public Service CommissionCourt of Appeals of Maryland · 1941
  3. Morris v. . HolshouserSupreme Court of North Carolina · 1941
  4. Morris v. HolshouserSupreme Court of North Carolina · 1941
  5. Foley v. K. Hovnanian at Kent Island, LLCCourt of Appeals of Maryland · 2009

10 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API