Legal Opinion · Concurrence

Commonwealth v. Gibbons

Supreme Court of Pennsylvania

Decided November 30, 2001No. 24, 26 E.D. Appeal Docket 2000Published

1ConcurrenceJustice Saylor

Although I join the majority’s disposition, I would emphasize that there is no absolute double jeopardy bar to appellate review of judgments of acquittal; the availability of such review is dependent upon the essential character of the court’s judgment; and the viability of the prosecution appeal depends upon whether the issue in question is one of law or fact.1 *32Differentiating questions of fact from 'questions of law has proven difficult for courts, with the characterization “as much a matter of allocation as it is. of analysis.” Miller v. Fenton, 474 U.S. 104, 114, 106 S.Ct. 445, 451, 88…

2Cases cited14 opinions

  1. Miller v. FentonSupreme Court of the United States · 1985
  2. United States v. ScottSupreme Court of the United States · 1978
  3. United States v. Martin Linen Supply Co.Supreme Court of the United States · 1977
  4. Commonwealth v. OhleSupreme Court of Pennsylvania · 1983
  5. Commonwealth v. PopeSupreme Court of Pennsylvania · 1974

9 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API