Legal Opinion
United States v. MacDonald
District Court, E.D. North Carolina
Decided August 8, 2014No. Nos. 3:75-CR-00026-F, 5:-06-CV-00024-FPublishedCited by 3 opinions
1Opinion of the Court
ORDER
JAMES C. FOX, Senior District Judge.
This matter is before the court on Jeffrey MacDonald’s Motion Pursuant to the Innocence Protection Act of 2004, 18 U.S.C. § 3600, for New Trial Based on DNA Testing Results and Other Relief [DE-176] (“the IPA motion”). For the reasons set forth below, the motion is DENIED.
RELEVANT PROCEDURAL HISTORY1
In 1997, MacDonald filed a motion, pursuant to Rule 60(b) of the Federal Rules of Civil Procedure, to reopen the proceedings on his second post-conviction motion which was filed in 1990. In the motion, MacDonald alleged fraud by the Government concerning…
2Cases cited6 opinions
- District Attorney's Office for the Third Judicial District v. OsborneSupreme Court of the United States · 2009
- United States v. Noah Beverly Johnny P. Crockett Douglas A. TurnsCourt of Appeals for the Sixth Circuit · 2004
- United States v. MacDonaldCourt of Appeals for the Fourth Circuit · 2011
- United States v. McCluskeyDistrict Court, D. New Mexico · 2013
- United States v. MacDonaldDistrict Court, E.D. North Carolina · 1997
1 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by3 opinions
- United States v. Shane CowleyCourt of Appeals for the Fourth Circuit · 2016
- United States v. Jeffrey MacDonaldCourt of Appeals for the Fourth Circuit · 2018
- United States v. ClipperDistrict Court, District of Columbia · 2016