Tung v. American University of the Caribbean
Court of Appeals of Iowa
1Opinion of the Court
SCHLEGEL, Judge.
Plaintiff, Harry Tung, appeals from the granting of a special appearance for defendants American University and Yife Tien in this action for breach of an employment contract and conversion. The question here is whether the nonresident defendants had sufficient contacts with Iowa to permit our courts to acquire personal jurisdiction over them. The trial court sustained defendants' special appearance after finding that “insufficient contacts exist” to subject the defendants to jurisdiction under Iowa Rule of Civil Procedure 56.2 and the governing due process stricture. We affirm.
2Cases cited9 opinions
- International Shoe Co. v. WashingtonSupreme Court of the United States · 1945
- Hanson v. DencklaSupreme Court of the United States · 1958
- Scullin Steel Company v. National Railway Utilization Corp.Court of Appeals for the Eighth Circuit · 1982
- Larsen v. SchollSupreme Court of Iowa · 1980
- Iowa Electric Light and Power Company v. Atlas CorporationCourt of Appeals for the Eighth Circuit · 1979
4 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by10 opinions
- Moki Mac River Expeditions v. DruggTexas Supreme Court · 2007
- Davis v. Baylor UniversityMissouri Court of Appeals · 1998
- Newton Manufacturing Co. v. Biogenetics, Ltd.Court of Appeals of Iowa · 1990
- Bankers Leasing Co. v. Eagle Valley Environmentalists, Inc.Court of Appeals of Iowa · 1986
- Taylor v. Trans-Action Associates, Inc.Court of Appeals of Iowa · 1993
5 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.