Legal Opinion

Flanagan v. Bruner

Texas Supreme Court

Decided July 1, 1853PublishedCited by 6 opinions

Error from Busk.

1Opinion of the Court

Hemphill, Ch. J.

These eases are all judgments hy confession, and one common error pervades them all, viz : that there was no affidavit hy plaintiff of the justness of the debt. The statute (art. 770) authorizes a person, for any bona fide debt, to appear without process, in person or hy attorney, and confess judgment; hut in such cases a petition shall always he filed and the justness of the debt sworn to hy the person in whose favor the judgment is confessed.

Petitions were filed in the several eases, hut in the two former there was no process, and in the latter, though a citation was made…

2Cited by6 opinions

  1. Smith v. RidleyCourt of Appeals of Texas · 1902
  2. Gilbert v. GilbertMissouri Court of Appeals · 1888
  3. Gerald v. BurtheeTexas Supreme Court · 1867
  4. Ludiker v. T. Ratto & Co.Court of Appeals of Texas · 1884
  5. RST Partnership v. Chelan CountyCourt of Appeals of Washington · 2019

1 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API