Legal Opinion
Merced v. United States
District Court, D. Oregon
Decided September 20, 2024No. 3:22-cv-01160Unknown
1Opinion
IN THE UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT FOR THE DISTRICT OF OREGON JAIME B. MERCED, an individual, Case No. 3:22-cv-01160-IM Plaintiff, OPINION AND ORDER GRANTING IN PART AND DENYING IN PART v. DEFENDANT’S MOTION FOR SUMMARY JUDGMENT UNITED STATES OF AMERICA, Defendant. Charles Robinowitz, 1211 SW Fifth Ave., Ste. 2323, Portland, OR 97205, and Edward M. Bull III, Brodsky Micklow Bull & Weiss, 955 Harbor Island Dr., Ste. 130, San Diego, CA 92101. Attorneys for Plaintiff. Frank J. Anders, U.S. Department of Justice, 450 Golden Gate Ave., Rm. 5395, San Francisco, CA 94102. Attorney for Defendant.…
2Cases cited48 opinions
- Anderson v. Liberty Lobby, Inc.Supreme Court of the United States · 1986
- Celotex Corp. v. Catrett, Administratrix of the Estate of CatrettSupreme Court of the United States · 1986
- Matsushita Electric Industrial Co., Ltd. v. Zenith Radio CorporationSupreme Court of the United States · 1986
- Daubert v. Merrell Dow Pharmaceuticals, Inc.Supreme Court of the United States · 1993
- Poller v. Columbia Broadcasting System, Inc.Supreme Court of the United States · 1962
43 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.