In Re Joseph Borden
Court of Appeals for the Federal Circuit
1Opinion of the Court
BRYSON, Circuit Judge.
Joseph Borden appeals from a decision of the Patent and Trademark Office Board of Patent Appeals and Interferences, which sustained the examiner’s rejection of Borden’s application for a design patent as obvious under 35 U.S.C. § 103. We affirm.
I
Borden filed a patent application on August 15, 1989, claiming an “Ornamental Design for a Twin Neck Dispensing Container.” The claimed design is reproduced below in Figure 1.
[[Image here]]
The claimed design comprises an oval-shaped main chamber with a cylindrical spout extending upward from one end, a cubical measuring chamber…
2Cases cited12 opinions
- Avia Group International, Inc., (Formerly Pensa, Inc.) v. L.A. Gear California, Inc.Court of Appeals for the Federal Circuit · 1988
- L.A. Gear, Inc., Plaintiff/cross-Appellant v. Thom McAn Shoe Company and Melville Corporation and Pagoda Trading Company, Inc.Court of Appeals for the Federal Circuit · 1993
- L. A. Gear, Inc. v. Thom McAn Shoe Co.Supreme Court of the United States · 1993
- Petersen Manufacturing Co., Inc. v. Central Purchasing, Inc.Court of Appeals for the Federal Circuit · 1984
- In Re Reid HarveyCourt of Appeals for the Federal Circuit · 1993
7 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by18 opinions
- Titan Tire Corp. v. Case New Holland, Inc.Court of Appeals for the Federal Circuit · 2009
- Oddzon Products, Inc. v. Just Toys, Inc., Lisco, Inc. And Spalding & Evenflo Companies, Inc., Defendants/cross-AppellantsCourt of Appeals for the Federal Circuit · 1997
- Apple, Inc. v. Samsung Electronics Co., Ltd.Court of Appeals for the Federal Circuit · 2012
- In Re Anita Dembiczak and Benson ZinbargCourt of Appeals for the Federal Circuit · 1999
- Jack T. Hupp and Walkmaker, Inc. v. Siroflex of America, Inc., Defendant/cross-AppellantCourt of Appeals for the Federal Circuit · 1997
13 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.