Petersen Manufacturing Co., Inc. v. Central Purchasing, Inc.
Court of Appeals for the Federal Circuit
1Opinion of the Court
NIES, Circuit Judge.
This appeal is from the grant of summa- . ry judgment by the United States District Court of the Central District of California (Real, C.J.), entered April 18, 1983, dismissing a complaint by Petersen Manufacturing Co. for patent infringement and unfair competition, and from an award of attorney fees to the accused infringer, Central Purchasing, Inc. Petersen asserts that summary judgment was improvidently granted in that genuine issues of material fact remain to be tried. Certain affidavits submitted by Petersen are claimed to raise factual issues with regard to the…
2Cases cited23 opinions
- First Nat. Bank of Ariz. v. Cities Service Co.Supreme Court of the United States · 1968
- Graham v. John Deere Co. of Kansas CitySupreme Court of the United States · 1966
- Sears, Roebuck & Co. v. Stiffel Co.Supreme Court of the United States · 1964
- Compco Corp. v. Day-Brite Lighting, Inc.Supreme Court of the United States · 1964
- Barmag Barmer Maschinenfabrik Ag v. Murata MacHinery Ltd., and Murata of America, Inc.Court of Appeals for the Federal Circuit · 1984
18 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by71 opinions
- Avia Group International, Inc., (Formerly Pensa, Inc.) v. L.A. Gear California, Inc.Court of Appeals for the Federal Circuit · 1988
- Newell Companies, Inc. v. Kenney Manufacturing Company, Defendant/cross-AppellantCourt of Appeals for the Federal Circuit · 1989
- Paragon Podiatry Laboratory, Inc. v. Klm Laboratories, Inc.Court of Appeals for the Federal Circuit · 1993
- Yamaha International Corporation v. Hoshino Gakki Co., Ltd., Assignee of Hoshino Gakki Ten Inc.Court of Appeals for the Federal Circuit · 1988
- Cable Electric Products, Inc. v. Genmark, Inc., A/K/A Diablo Products Corp.Court of Appeals for the Federal Circuit · 1985
66 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.