DAK, PLL v. Franklin County Board of Revision
Ohio Supreme Court
1Per curiam
{¶ 1} Appellant, DAK, PLL (“DAK”) has filed appeals contesting the valuation by the Board of Tax Appeals (“BTA”) of 13 condominium units that DAK owns. These appeals have been consolidated for purposes of hearing and decision.
{¶ 2} The 13 units whose values are being contested are located in Downing Place, a 31-unit condominium complex on Bethel Road in Columbus. The Downing Place complex consists of six buildings: two buildings containing eight units each, three buildings containing four units each, and one budding containing three units. One of the four-family buildings faces Bethel Road,…
2Cases cited9 opinions
- Cardinal Federal Savings & Loan Ass'n v. Cuyahoga County Board of RevisionOhio Supreme Court · 1975
- Youngstown Sheet & Tube Co. v. Mahoning County Board of RevisionOhio Supreme Court · 1981
- Witt Co. v. Hamilton County Board of RevisionOhio Supreme Court · 1991
- Simmons v. Cuyahoga County Board of RevisionOhio Supreme Court · 1998
- American Steel & Wire Co. of New Jersey v. Board of RevisionOhio Supreme Court · 1942
4 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by14 opinions
- Olmsted Falls Board of Education v. Cuyahoga County Board of RevisionOhio Supreme Court · 2009
- Strongsville Board of Education v. Cuyahoga County Board of RevisionOhio Supreme Court · 2007
- Colonial Village Ltd. v. Washington County Board of RevisionOhio Supreme Court · 2007
- Columbus City Schools Bd. of Edn. v. Franklin Cty. Bd. of Revision (Slip Opinion)Ohio Supreme Court · 2016
- Soin v. Greene County Board of RevisionOhio Supreme Court · 2006
9 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.