Legal Opinion

Strongsville Board of Education v. Cuyahoga County Board of Revision

Ohio Supreme Court

Decided January 17, 2007No. 2005-1638PublishedCited by 42 opinions

1Opinion of the CourtLanzinger, J.

{¶ 1} The issue before us is whether the Board of Tax Appeals (“BTA”) erred in relying upon appraisal evidence instead of the recent sale price to determine *310property value for tax purposes. Because its decision was not unreasonable or unlawful, we affirm the BTA’s decision.

{¶ 2} This appeal as of right concerns the valuation of real property located at 17800 Royalton Road in Strongsville. The property, consisting of 21.4783 acres of land and a three-story office building built and occupied by the Ceres Group, Inc. (“Ceres”), contains a total of 121,770 square feet. The tax years at issue are…

2Cases cited12 opinions

  1. Cardinal Federal Savings & Loan Ass'n v. Cuyahoga County Board of RevisionOhio Supreme Court · 1975
  2. Berea City School District Board of Education v. Cuyahoga County Board of RevisionOhio Supreme Court · 2005
  3. Walters v. Knox County Board of RevisionOhio Supreme Court · 1989
  4. Episcopal Parish of Christ Church v. KinneyOhio Supreme Court · 1979
  5. First Baptist Church of Milford, Inc. v. WilkinsOhio Supreme Court · 2006

7 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by42 opinions

  1. Olmsted Falls Board of Education v. Cuyahoga County Board of RevisionOhio Supreme Court · 2009
  2. Meijer Stores Ltd. Partnership v. Franklin County Board of RevisionOhio Supreme Court · 2009
  3. FirstCal Industrial 2 Acquisitions, L.L.C. v. Franklin County Board of RevisionOhio Supreme Court · 2010
  4. Worthington City Schools Bd. of Edn. v. Franklin Cty. Bd. of Revision (Slip Opinion)Ohio Supreme Court · 2014
  5. HIN, L.L.C. v. Cuyahoga County Board of RevisionOhio Supreme Court · 2010

37 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API