Strongsville Board of Education v. Cuyahoga County Board of Revision
Ohio Supreme Court
1Opinion of the CourtLanzinger, J.
{¶ 1} The issue before us is whether the Board of Tax Appeals (“BTA”) erred in relying upon appraisal evidence instead of the recent sale price to determine *310property value for tax purposes. Because its decision was not unreasonable or unlawful, we affirm the BTA’s decision.
{¶ 2} This appeal as of right concerns the valuation of real property located at 17800 Royalton Road in Strongsville. The property, consisting of 21.4783 acres of land and a three-story office building built and occupied by the Ceres Group, Inc. (“Ceres”), contains a total of 121,770 square feet. The tax years at issue are…
2Cases cited12 opinions
- Cardinal Federal Savings & Loan Ass'n v. Cuyahoga County Board of RevisionOhio Supreme Court · 1975
- Berea City School District Board of Education v. Cuyahoga County Board of RevisionOhio Supreme Court · 2005
- Walters v. Knox County Board of RevisionOhio Supreme Court · 1989
- Episcopal Parish of Christ Church v. KinneyOhio Supreme Court · 1979
- First Baptist Church of Milford, Inc. v. WilkinsOhio Supreme Court · 2006
7 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by42 opinions
- Olmsted Falls Board of Education v. Cuyahoga County Board of RevisionOhio Supreme Court · 2009
- Meijer Stores Ltd. Partnership v. Franklin County Board of RevisionOhio Supreme Court · 2009
- FirstCal Industrial 2 Acquisitions, L.L.C. v. Franklin County Board of RevisionOhio Supreme Court · 2010
- Worthington City Schools Bd. of Edn. v. Franklin Cty. Bd. of Revision (Slip Opinion)Ohio Supreme Court · 2014
- HIN, L.L.C. v. Cuyahoga County Board of RevisionOhio Supreme Court · 2010
37 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.