Legal Opinion

Halleran v. Sander

Washington Supreme Court

Decided July 23, 1931No. 23118. Department OnePublishedCited by 3 opinions

1Opinion of the CourtMitchell, J.

Halleran Bros., a copartnership, appellants, plaintiffs below, entered into a written contract with the state highway commission for the construction of a certain state highway in Lewis county, the National Surety Company becoming surety on the contractors’ bond. The contractors sublet the entire work by separate portions to each of several contractors, among them being respondents Carl Sander, B. & B. Building Material Company, and one Phillips, for which latter the Constitution Indemnity Company became surety. Phillips and his surety have made no appearance in this court.

The construction…

2Cases cited6 opinions

  1. Maryland Casualty Co. v. Washington National BankWashington Supreme Court · 1916
  2. Brace & Hergert Mill Co. v. BurbankWashington Supreme Court · 1915
  3. Cornelius v. Washington Steam LaundryWashington Supreme Court · 1909
  4. Maryland Casualty Co. v. HillWashington Supreme Court · 1918
  5. Siler Mill Co. v. Charles Nelson Co.Washington Supreme Court · 1917

1 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by3 opinions

  1. United States Fidelity & Guaranty Co. v. E. I. Dupont De Nemours & Co.Washington Supreme Court · 1939
  2. Maryland Casualty Co. v. City of TacomaWashington Supreme Court · 1939
  3. Brear v. Washington State Highway CommissionWashington Supreme Court · 1965

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API