Legal Opinion

State v. De Jonge

Oregon Supreme Court

Decided October 9, 1935PublishedCited by 7 opinions

1Opinion of the CourtBailey, J.

The defendant, Dirk De Jonge, was on September 29, 1934, indicted by the grand jury of Multnomah county, Oregon. The charging part of the indictment is as follows:

“The said Dirk De Jonge, Don Cluster, Edward R. Denny and Earl Stewart on the 27th day of July, A. D. 1934, in the county of Multnomah and state of Oregon, then and there being, did then and there unlawfully and feloniously preside at, conduct and assist in conducting an assemblage of persons, organization, society and group, to-wit: The Communist Party, a more particular description of which said assemblage of persons,…

2Cases cited8 opinions

  1. Whitney v. CaliforniaSupreme Court of the United States · 1927
  2. Fiske v. KansasSupreme Court of the United States · 1927
  3. State v. LaundyOregon Supreme Court · 1922
  4. State v. HennessyWashington Supreme Court · 1921
  5. Burns v. United StatesSupreme Court of the United States · 1927

3 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by7 opinions

  1. De Jonge v. OregonSupreme Court of the United States · 1937
  2. State v. FolkesOregon Supreme Court · 1944
  3. State of Oregon v. CahillOregon Supreme Court · 1956
  4. State v. SolomanUtah Supreme Court · 1937
  5. West v. BentleyUtah Supreme Court · 1940

2 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API