Legal Opinion
Reynolds v. Mainegeneral Health
Court of Appeals for the First Circuit
Decided July 17, 2000No. 99-2153PublishedCited by 61 opinions
1Opinion of the Court
KEETON, District Judge.
This appeal requires us to interpret the scope of coverage under the Emergency Medical Treatment and Active Labor Act (EMTALA), 42 U.S.C. § 1395dd, for secondary risks associated with emergency conditions. After reviewing the record in light of the statutory scheme, we affirm the district court’s summary judgment in favor of defendant-appellee MaineGeneral Health.
I. The Facts
Because we are reviewing the district court’s summary judgment in favor of defendant-appellee, we recite the. facts in the light most favorable to the plaintiffs-appellants. See Fed.R.Civ.P. 56.
On…
2Cases cited7 opinions
- Correa v. Hospital San FranciscoCourt of Appeals for the First Circuit · 1995
- Marshall Ex Rel. Marshall v. East Carroll Parish Hospital Service DistrictCourt of Appeals for the Fifth Circuit · 1998
- Harold Summers v. Baptist Medical Center ArkadelphiaCourt of Appeals for the Eighth Circuit · 1996
- Franklin D. Vickers, of the Estate of Martin Wade Vickers v. Nash General Hospital, Incorporated James R. Hughes, M.D.Court of Appeals for the Fourth Circuit · 1996
- Baber v. Hospital Corp. of AmericaCourt of Appeals for the Fourth Circuit · 1992
2 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by61 opinions
- Bernie Harry, as Personal Representative of the Estate of Lisa Normil, Deceased v. Wayne Marchant, M.D., Ali Bazzi, M.D.Court of Appeals for the Eleventh Circuit · 2002
- Morales v. Sociedad Española De Auxilio Mutuo Y BeneficenciaCourt of Appeals for the First Circuit · 2008
- Torres Otero v. Hospital General MenonitaDistrict Court, D. Puerto Rico · 2000
- Ramos-Cruz v. Centro Medico Del TuraboCourt of Appeals for the First Circuit · 2011
- Cruz-Vázquez v. Mennonite General Hospital, Inc.Court of Appeals for the First Circuit · 2013
56 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.