Legal Opinion

Rosen v. Rosen

Court of Appeals of North Carolina

Decided February 4, 1992No. 918DC63PublishedCited by 5 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

WELLS, Judge.

Procedurally, we first note that plaintiff has assigned error to the trial court’s denial of her motion for summary judgment. In Harris v. Walden, 314 N.C. 284, 333 S.E.2d 254 (1985), our Supreme Court held “that the denial of a motion for summary judgment is not reviewable during an appeal from a final judgment rendered in a trial on the merits.” There having been such a trial and final judgment in this case, this question is not before us.

Substantially, this appeal presents the question of the enforceability of the following provision in the parties’ separation agreement:

8.…

2Cases cited3 opinions

  1. Harris v. WaldenSupreme Court of North Carolina · 1985
  2. MCB LTD. v. McGowanCourt of Appeals of North Carolina · 1987
  3. Mountain Federal Land Bank v. First Union National BankCourt of Appeals of North Carolina · 1990

3Cited by5 opinions

  1. Kornegay v. Aspen Asset Group, LLCCourt of Appeals of North Carolina · 2010
  2. Jerome Kleber v. Carla (Kleber) Butorac, and Ashlyn P.A. KleberIndiana Court of Appeals · 2013
  3. Micro Capital Investors, Inc. v. Broyhill Furniture Industries, Inc.Court of Appeals of North Carolina · 2012
  4. NRC Golf Course, LLC v. JMR Golf, LLCCourt of Appeals of North Carolina · 2012
  5. Rabbi Yitzhak Joel Miller - Adversary ProceedingUnited States Bankruptcy Court, M.D. North Carolina · 2023

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API